by 
90% of properties in Lithuania are over 22 years old, with high energy consumption. Old Lithuanian blocks consume approximately seven times more energy than newly renovated blocks) and high energy bills for poorer communities. This causes problem in the management and exploitation of these buildings. Current energy characteristics of such buildings do not guarantee effective consumption of energy and result in high running costs.
Therefore, the overall aim of the project is to improve the use of existing housing in Lithuania through supporting a series of measures linked to housing maintenance, upgrading and modernization particularly to improve energy efficiency. It does this by providing loans to households for up to 30% of the total cost of the renovation. The project, through its use of recycled loans (rather than grants) also tackles the significant challenge of meeting the large cost of housing improvement in Lithuania (estimated to be €13 billion in total).
The modernisation of multi-apartment blocks built during the Soviet era is one of the overarching priorities of the Lithuanian Government to improve energy efficiency. The renovation of multi-apartment buildings could potentially achieve around 30 to 60% of the energy efficiency potential. As a result, the Lithuanian Government aims to save 2.7 TWh through the modernisation of multi-apartment buildings by 2020.
In addition, national energy efficiency programmes should also aim to:
• Improve the living standard of population
• Revive the Lithuanian construction sector
• Reduce Lithuania’s dependency on a single energy supplier
• Leverage public funds in a way that attracts maximum contributions from the private sector
From the point of view of the home-owners, the main objectives of the renovations are to lower heating expenses, increase thermal comfort, improve the appearance of buildings and their surroundings and increase real-estate values. The multi-apartment Buildings Modernisation Programme (“the Modernisation Programme”) is one of the main instruments of the Lithuanian Government to implement energy efficiency renovations.
During the 2007-2013 programming period it was financed by JESSICA Holding Fund Lithuania (“JESSICA I”). JESSICA I was a revolving financial instrument, which blended EU and national funds to bridge the financing gap for energy efficiency projects in Lithuania. JESSICA I primarily offered preferential loans for energy efficiency modernisation.
The preferential loans were issued at a 3% fixed interest rate with maturity of a 20 years. In addition, homeowners were initially eligible for up to 40% subsidy upon reaching certain energy efficiency goals after the renovation. Eventually the size of the subsidy decreased as the Modernisation Programme gained popularity.
Furthermore, low income households benefited from additional support from municipalities that covered their monthly loan payments.
In 2010, the energy efficiency of housing had been improving significantly in Lithuania over the previous ten years in part as a result of the JESSICA I program to implement energy efficiency renovations. However, the energy consumption was still much higher than the average in the EU or old Member States. Around 60% of the more than 38,000 multi-apartment buildings in Lithuania still required some form of energy refurbishment due to having inefficient heating systems and equipment, and poor building insulation. About 66% of the population lives in multi-apartment buildings that were built before 1993, and 97% of those multi-apartment buildings are privately owned. This means a majority vote by the home-owners is needed to begin renovation of the building. In addition, homeowners often lacked the experience or financial capacity to implement renovations. This created challenges wide-scale renovation efforts to gain momentum.
Low income home-owners also did not have sufficient incentive to improve energy efficiency, because these households were eligible for heating costs compensation. Although the Lithuanian Government had attempted to implement renovation programmes, these were relatively expensive and were discontinued.
An assessment report in 2014 identified the need to renovate approximately 7,000 multi-apartment buildings, which would cost more than €1.3 billion. Public funds alone are not sufficient to meet such a financial demand, so that an instrument that uses public funds more efficiently was required.
Finally, a key challenge of setting up a new renovation programme was to raise public awareness of the benefits of renovations, so that home-owners would become more engaged.
In May 2015, Jessica II was established as a follow-up fund to JESSICA I with €150 million of 2014-2020 European Structural and Investment Funds. Jessica II closely follows JESSICA I’s objective, form and product, namely to finance energy efficiency projects in residential housing in Lithuania through preferential loans.
The priority for Jessica II was to maximise the leverage of its assets through private finance in order to minimise national public contributions to the scheme. To this end, the fund manager (the European Investment Bank) created a specific instrument called ‘pre-financings’, which are secured by the future re-flows from the Jessica II portfolio. This instrument was used to attract €180 million of resources from financial intermediaries, including commercial banks and a public agency. This was the first time that these institutions took risks on these type of loans in Lithuania. As a next step, the European Investment Bank has developed a first-loss portfolio guarantee instrument, which aims to attract even more private funding. As of March 2018, nearly 700 multi-apartment buildings have successfully finished modernisation renovations, while renovation of another 400 multi-apartment buildings are expected to be financed with the available funds.
Under JESSICA I, €265 million (consisting of EU structural funds, Lithuanian national funds, private contributions and revolved reflows) has been fully committed and over 1,000 multi-apartment buildings across Lithuania have completed energy efficiency modernisation renovations. All of Lithuania’s 60 municipalities have participated in the Modernisation Programme. JESSICA I enjoyed wide public support at national and municipal level, and attracted domestic attention and international recognition as a successful financial instrument for energy efficiency in housing. The Modernisation Programme was recognised as strategically important in view of the impact of energy efficiency measures on energy demand reduction and thus indirectly on energy security and independence. In addition, the programme had a positive effect on job creation and economic growth. Hence, the Lithuanian Government was eager to continue with the Modernisation Programme.
Overall achievements:
Additional Benefits include:
• Reduced energy consumption significantly (up to 60% energy savings on average)
• Achieved higher energy efficiency potential (at least Classification C)
• Lowered energy bills
• Improved living conditions
The success factors include:
The most important lessons learned:
In order to replicate the model in other countries, the following is necessary:
• Strong support from the public sector at regional or national level – the product or programme may need to be customised in order to better bridge the market gap.
• Subsidised loan support scheme – the initiative must be affordable to the home-owners and they have to clearly see a payoff in a reasonable timeframe,
• Existence of dedicated housing cooperations or housing providers – required to facilitate the mobilisation of home-owners to engage in the programme.
• Expertise from the public sector side, the housing cooperations and the financial intermediaries – efficient project pipeline management, project preparation, procurement processes and financing procedures.
• Trust between participants – assurances aid developing trust in the programme, which leads to higher interest from the public to participate, and increased private sector invests which leverage the available public funds.
national
Timeframe: 2009 – 2020
Funding method: ERDF funds, private resources and JESSICA reflows
Financing method: preferential loans
More details on Build Up: https://www.buildup.eu/en/node/56614 and on the EPOV project website: https://www.energypoverty.eu/sites/default/files/downloads/publications/18-07/case_study_-_jessica_ii_without_url.pdf
https://www.eib.org/en/projects/pipelines/all/20170116
